tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post112683079978758307..comments2023-10-30T07:52:59.219-05:00Comments on AFROMUSING: Sen. Dianne FeinsteinAfromusinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08053160240579454113noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-35477770708988543222015-05-03T11:42:06.113-05:002015-05-03T11:42:06.113-05:00thanks for sharingthanks for sharingPelangsing cepathttp://herbalslimm.blogspot.com/2012/10/quick-slim-herbal-plus-pelangsing-alami.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1127258348022388462005-09-20T18:19:00.000-05:002005-09-20T18:19:00.000-05:00hey guys, this is really interesting getting your ...hey guys, this is really interesting getting your input about this...Sen. Harry Reid is going to vote NO(oranges) on Roberts, so i guess its something to watch. Thanks again for your input, feel free to post updates on this thread :)Afromusinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08053160240579454113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1126889968239918552005-09-16T11:59:00.000-05:002005-09-16T11:59:00.000-05:00As the issue stands right now, I think (and JJR ag...As the issue stands right now, I think (and JJR agrees) that the more crucial matter is who replaces Sandra Day O'Connor. Since John Roberts is not a total wacko, his nomination will definitely sail through. Will he advance womens'/minority rights? Definitely not. Will he maintain the status quo? We do not know. He cannot be worse than the ultra conservative guy he's replacing (Renquist). I think the nomination to watch is that of O'Connor's replacement. That could really have a huge impact on wide arrray of judicial matters...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1126887359443039282005-09-16T11:15:00.000-05:002005-09-16T11:15:00.000-05:00I think there are 2 sides - some judges who interp...I think there are 2 sides - some judges who interpret the constitution and those who stick to its text as intended by the founding fathers ... (Scalia, Thomas) alot of the future depends on where he will fit it<BR/><BR/>I respect this guy - been following on NPR<BR/><BR/>a. He declined to answer most Q coz he will be dealing with them in near term and he does not want to compromise the integrity of the court by saying one thing in a sworn confirmation hearing and dissenting in his rullings<BR/><BR/>b. He kept saying in the court, judges discuss internally and some may change sides, by giving answers at the hearing, he will have have put himself in one corner without considering all evidence<BR/><BR/>c. He raised a very important point - his views DONT matter, as a lawyer he was representing his clients .... so he support his views ... makes sense to me ....<BR/><BR/>d. Rights {women, minority} - he supported a Reagan era deal about removing the need for Quotas in affirmative action ..... not killing Affirmative action .... bottom line - the client was Reagan :)<BR/><BR/>I respect this guy - and its laughable that the senators could not get ANYTHING out of him<BR/><BR/>American Bar Association gave him a thumbs up but National Association of Female Litigators was concerned a little .....<BR/>{http://www.abanet.org/nawl/news/release083005.html}Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1126880700986141442005-09-16T09:25:00.000-05:002005-09-16T09:25:00.000-05:00Cant offer much by virtue of being clueless bout t...Cant offer much by virtue of being clueless bout the whole issue...<BR/><BR/>However, I did like illegal amigos from a purely phonic perspective.<BR/><BR/>I was imagining a kyuk calling out to his "Illego Amigo" LOL<BR/><BR/>Auuuwu... I've dotted!!Milonarehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01573752810605404130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1126865382817279962005-09-16T05:09:00.000-05:002005-09-16T05:09:00.000-05:00medusa, i think it makes sense. After hearing abou...medusa, i think it makes sense. After hearing about his memos and his liner notes i felt quite queasy, especially since womens/minority rights do appear in jeopardy (am i being paranoid?)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694709.post-1126851082775484472005-09-16T01:11:00.000-05:002005-09-16T01:11:00.000-05:00I've been following the hearings on NPR as well- a...I've been following the hearings on NPR as well- albeit infrequently. Some days, its drawn out and I just kinda nod off.. Thus far,it seems he's quite the artful dodger..more than once 'respectfully declining' to answer questions- Despite my rudimentary knowledge of the entire process and his record, from what I've heard so far..i think historians many years from now will mark his appointment as the beginning of a societal/cultural revolution in the US of A..( I dunno if all that makes sense..I promise it does in my head)Medusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16908907865524260722noreply@blogger.com